https://medium.com/law-and-justice-macedonia/to-the-judiciary-the-judge-the-rule-of-law-the-public-word-f61fa99541bf

Reading a comment by the respectable and honorable retired Judge of the highest Court in the Republic-Supreme Court, more precisely she’s personal attitude of many readed until now,I was arouse to briefly share some of my own insights about the categories mentioned in the title.
Public word …
It seems to me that I have never heard of any Judge breaking the “ice” and leak to the public, of course protecting the integrity of the parties, the participants or anyone involved actor in the proceedings before the judicial authorities, with his personal attitude, opinion or point of view about the particular decision of the Court in extent that it would be reasonable to preserve the dignity of this function, the dignity of the actors in any and all proceedings before the Court, for the sake of argument present it’s own legal point of views on precisely determined specific procedural events and facts from the angle of of the court independence, personal independence and dignity of this function which I understand as compatible with personas of high moral, personal and professional code on perceptions of conquest in their personal judges independence.
Function that is seen as a picture and a respect, as well as an honor to those who perform it.
For a very, very long time there is a dam in the syntagm of “judgments could not be commented” behind which screen might be seen into the essence of the fear of discovering autonomy and independence in creating the general impression of this, for me, the most essential pillar in the structure and of our State order.
I have never heard of any Judge publicly announcing his personal attitudes, lets say engaging in the “inadmissible commentary of the decision of the Court “.
I am quite sure that this will not only lead to the strengthening or’ ruining of independence of the Judges, but also to the breaking of the space overall range in which the Judge is self-sufficient with wide, essential and substantially understanding of their independence.
After all, each Judge is personally responsible under the Constitution stipulates and the Law of his freely expressed personal thoughts, attitude, principal points of view through the imposed barrier where exist only silence for naw.
Equal is my understanding that “Court decisions must not be commented “ which in fact may be defended for/and the question “Who’ indeed perform the Judicial power… ? Judicial or/not executive power’. “
There is no doubt that any statement of one’s own views on the Court’s obligatory attitudes on particular legal, factual or/and other fundamental views is welcomed to create a clime of openness to cognition, independence and other legally, morally ethical, personal or professional attitudes and Code of Judge’s Conduct would make a major contribution to restoring citizens’ confidence in the Court, and even more in executive power, where in their correlations are reflected mutuality of independence of the performers of Judge function.
Judge, Judiciary, the Rule of Law I would place without any doubt in this mirror with my essential impression and cognition of the high level of mutual reciprocal sheared sovereignty of our State and their citizens with, perhaps a blind pursuit of harmonizing the judicial system by looking at textual premises, unknowing determinations and their views on modern trends in the development of this and every other segment of the state structure.
Last but not least, the public attitude towards the judiciary as well as the public personal appearances of the judges in expressing their personal independent and/or autonomous positions in the rule of law are becoming more prominent in the jurisdictions or states whose jurisdictions encourage such acts in the faith. or the ruin of this foundation of state power, that such an atmosphere would give birth to a sense of progress towards which we each strive.
Even more important to me would be that ‘the Law should not be changed but applied’.
I hope that this article will provoke something different or equal point of views which I would gladly read them.
Skopje October, 2 2019
Aleksandar Pulejkov
Kon Sudskata vlast, Sudijata, vladeenjeto na pravoto, javniot zbor
Čitajќi eden komentar od penzioniran respektibilen i počituvan Sudija na najvisokiot Sud vo Republikata-Vrhovniot Sud, potočno ličen stav od mnogute dosega pročitani, dobiv pobuda nakratko da spodelam nekoi moi svaќanja na kategoriite spomenati vo naslovot.
Javniot zbor…
Mi se čini deka dosega nemam spoznaeno nekoj Sudija da go skrši “ mrazot “ i da ileze pred javnosta, se razbira štitejќi go integritetot na strankite, učesnicite uli pak bilo koj akter vo postapuvanjeto pred sudskite vlasti , so svoj ličen stav za poodelna odluka donesena od Sudot vo mera koja bi bila razumna da go sočuva dostoinstvoto na funkcijata, dostoinstvoto na akterite vo bilo koe i kakvo postapuvanje pred Sudot, da argumentira i iznesuva svoi pravni svaќanja za točno opredeleni konkretni procesuirani nastani i fakti od agol na sudskata samostojnost, nezavisnost i dignitet na ovaa funkcija koja jas ja podrazbiram spojliva so ličnosti od visok moralen ličen i profesionalen kodeks na poimanjata na ophoduvanjeto vo nivnata nezavisnost i samostojnost.
Funkcija koja se gleda kako slika i počit, kako i čest kon onie koi ja vršat.
Mnogu, mnogu dolgo opstojuva edna brana vo sintagmata “ sudskite odluki ne se komentiraat “ zad čij paravan možebi bi moželo da se ѕirne vo suštinata na stravot od otkrivanje na samostojnosta i nezavisnosta vo sozdavanjeto na opštite vpečatoci na ovoj, za mene najsuštestven stolb vo strukturata i ustrojstvoto na našeto državno ureduvanje.
Ne sum čul dosega deka nekoj Sudija javno se oglasil so svoi lični stanovišta, da rečeme vpuštajќi se vo “ nedozvolenata svera na komentiranje na sudskite odluki“.Sosem sum siguren deka vakvo nešto ne samo što ќe vodi kon zajaknuvanje ili pak ruiniranje na samostojnosta i nezavisnosta na vršitelite na ovaa funkcija tuku i kon rušenje na prostorniot opseg vo koj e samosmesten Sudijata so široko i suštinski svatenata nivna samostojnost i nezavisnost.Vpročem sekoj Sudija e lično odgovoren pred Ustavot i Zakonot za svojata slobodno izrazena msla, stav, stanovište preku nametnata bariera vo koja zasega postoi samo molk.
Ednakvo e i moeto svaќanje kon toa deka “sudskite odluki ne smeat da se komentiraat“ što i vsašnost možebi e braana za/i prašanjeto “Koj ja vrši Sudskata vlast…? Sudskata ili/ne izvršnata vlast’ “
Nesomneno e deka bilo kakvo iznesuvanje na svoi lični stanovišta vo pogled na svaќanjata na Sud po poodelni pravni, faktički, i drugi fundamentalni stavovi e dobrodojdeno kon sozdavanjeto na klima na otvorenost kon osoznavanjeto na samostojnosta, nezavisnosta kako i drugite zakonski, moralno etički lični ili profesionalni stavovi i Kodeks na seopšto odnesuvanje na Sudijata, bi dal ogromen pridones kon vraќanjeto na verbata na graѓanite vo Sudot i ušte poveќe vo vlasta kade vzaemno se ogleduvaat soodnosite na samostojnosta i nezavisnosta na vršitelite na ovaa funkcija no podobro Koj ja vrši sudskata vlast.
Sudijata, sudstvoto, vladeenjeto na pravoto jas bi go smestil vo ova ogledalo so moj suštestven vpečatok i spoznanie za visokoto nivo na spodeluvanje na suverenosta na našata država i suverenitet so možebi slepo trčanje kon harmonizacija na pravosudniot sistem gledajќi go niz tekstualni premisi, neosoznaeni opredelbi i svoi stavovi za sovremenite pravci vo razvojot na ovoj i sekoj drug segment vo ustrojstvoto na državata.
Pa na kraj bi rekol, a vpročem javniot stav kon sudskite stavovi kako i javnite lični nastapi na sudiite so iznesuvanje na svoite lični nezavisni i/ili samostojni stanovišta vo svaќanjeto na pravoto se se poprisatni vo jurisdikciite odnosno državite čii jurisdikcii vakvite činovi gi ohrabruvaat vo verbata ili ruiniranosta na ovoj temel od državnata vlast, deka vakva atmosvera bi rodila čuvstvo na progres kon koj sekoj od nas se stremime.
Duri ušte poznačajno bi bilo za mene deka ‘Zakonot ne treba da se menuva tuku primenuva’.
Se nadevam deka ovoj tekst ќe pobudi nekoe poinakvo ili ednakvo ili bilo kako svaќanje koe so zadovolstvo ќe go pročitam.
Skopje Oktomvri, 2 2019 godina
Aleksandar Pulejkov
Puno pozdrava ujedno cestitajuci Vam Novogodisnje i Bozicnje praznike
Aleksandar https;//pulejkov.com

Ostavite odgovor:

Vaša adresa e-pošte neće biti objavljena. Neophodna polja su označena *